Marjane Satrapi’s graphic memoir is a uniquely powerful account of the life of a fiery young girl growing up in the death and destruction of the Islamic Revolution. What surprised me most about this memoir is how effective the comic strip layout and images were in revealing the story of a childhood; a childhood that was ridden by fear, fear to walk outside, fear to dress with style, fear to be and say anything you wanted. The black and white images displayed a deepening contrast that took me into a world where the idea of right and wrong, black and white, was meaningless. I appreciated Satrapi’s simple, conversational language as it conveyed the reality of life in Tehran during the revolution and war with Iraq. Although this left me less engaged as a writer with the language, I was constantly moved and emotionally charged by the natural component of the story. She told it like it was.
Surprisingly, in a book flooded with murdered loved ones, bombing victims, exiled revolutionaries, and cultural oppression Satrapi maintains a sense of humor throughout. Her often sarcastic and witty undertone empowers the story by unveiling the absurdity of what was going on: women forced to cover all their hair, men tortured for throwing parties, children punished for wearing Nikes. The humor reveals a characteristic of human nature, one where the only way to survive a life of such pain and repression is to laugh, to find the only humor in the situation, and alternatively to express the extreme mistreatment of the Islamic Regime.
Many of the comic images are grotesquely graphic and blunt: a man cut into pieces, bodies flying in different directions from an explosion, backs lashed with whips and soaked with urine. Although disturbing, these simple black and white images were as powerful to me as if I had seen them in a real film. Satrapi in no way sugarcoats a situation or edits it down for pleasant viewing. And to see it in a comic book format, a book normally filled with childhood images of superheroes and fantasies, makes it all the more moving.
I ended up watching the film “Persepolis” before reading the memoir. Initially I felt as though the book would be less compelling since I had already seen the movie and knew what was going to happen. But it ended up having the opposite effect. The situation with Marjane’s country, who is in power, the history of the regime, who is fighting with who and why is all rather complicated. Having had the movie lay it out for me ended up being extremely helpful when I got to the book. I knew who was who, how they were related and was therefore able to spend more time on the story itself and the character of Marjane, rather than the logistics of the situation. Surprisingly, I felt like the book contained much more detail (even though it was only the first part of the film:her childhood) and as a result, found myself even more engrossed than in the film.
As an American, who only knows the facts about what Marjane grew up in, I found this form of storytelling educational, emotional, powerful and real. I felt more connected and could better understand some of what Marjane and her family experienced by reading pages of comic book graphics over any documentary or news broadcasting. It was unique and refreshing, and proved the power of communication, despite its form.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great response Libba...this is concise but doesn't give away the story or the ending. I agree that watching the movie first clarifies the Iran, Iraq, and Fundamentalist confusion that is sometimes in the book. The movie also gives you more information on her life after she leaves Iran, which really showed the affects of the war. She was depressed, guilty, lonely, and sad because she missed her family. She was also struggling with her identity as an Iranian.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that the memoir worked very well as a graphic novel. However, it didn't give room for reflection. I would assume that Satrapi is showing us what happened when she was a child and teenager and at that time, she was living in such overwhelming conditions that reflection was an unattainable luxury.
Great response, Libba. I hadn't even thought about the contrast between black and white and the power there. It made me think of other contrasts - such as the horror of her stories with the contrast of cartoon.
ReplyDeleteI agree that reading a graphic novel as a writer is a bit less engaging, but that the power in her story is that of an individual surviving in it. Of course it will be more engaging than watching a news reel about the fighting, there is so much emotion conveyed in her images, their are unique and wrenching.
I really like your comment that the black and white illustrations showed how meaningless the ideas of right and wrong were at that time. I actually took it the opposite way--that it kind of highlighted that mentality. But you're right, it also shows how meaningless that had become. So interesting!
ReplyDeleteI appreciated your comment about humor, that it may be the only way to survive the kinds of horror one sometimes has to suffer in that part of the world (but not only there: how can we, as writers, use humor to tell a tragic story, and why might we want to do that?)
ReplyDelete